Start with the evidence
Define the start and end events for waiting and preserve the reason as observed, not assumed. Record whether the direct time-cost rate already covers that period. Distinguish active work, travel, waiting and unknown time so a large total can be investigated without blaming a person from incomplete records.
A worked example
Fictional comparison: two jobs each collect $180 and have $50 in other specified direct costs. Job A takes one hour at $30 per hour, leaving $100 contribution. Job B includes another forty-five minutes waiting, making time cost $52.50 and contribution $77.50. The $22.50 difference follows the stated internal cost assumption; it does not establish a charge owed by the customer.
Choose the next action
Use the record to identify preventable information or scheduling gaps. Confirm the relevant facts with the operator before changing the process. If waiting arises from conditions outside the business’s control, preserve that context. Do not invent a standard waiting fee or assume that every extra minute can be billed.
Check whether it worked
Review actual time records after a process change using comparable service types. Show the number of jobs with missing timestamps. Check whether reduced waiting changes the business’s available time or contribution under its own cost model. If the improvement is only a bookkeeping reclassification, describe it that way rather than calling it new profit.
Put it to work
A record you can use
- Waiting start and end
- Observed reason
- Time-cost assumption
- Contribution with and without waiting
- Process change and later evidence
Plain text. No email required. Store completed records in your approved business systems.
Next useful step
Need help applying this to your marketing? A strategy call starts with your business and the evidence you have.
Talk through your next step →For a general editorial question, email Chris. Please leave out customer details. Questions are private, and no response time is promised.